THE LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE YOU'RE FACING
You're navigating territory where there's no playbook:
→ Integrating new technologies your team doesn't understand → Leading through organizational change while maintaining operations → Making strategic decisions with incomplete information → Balancing innovation with operational stability → Building consensus when perspectives conflict → Developing resilience in the face of constant uncertainty
Traditional leadership coaching offers frameworks and models. But frameworks don't help when you're the CEO deciding whether to bet the company on a technology integration, or the COO trying to make that decision work in production, or the technical leader who has to design the system that delivers on both promises.
You need someone who's actually done it.
I'VE SAT IN EVERY CHAIR
I didn't just advise on leadership. I lived it from every angle:
As CEO: Made strategic decisions about technology investments, vendor relationships, and company direction. Decided what to build, what to buy, and what to walk away from. Raised capital. Managed boards. Built teams. Faced crises that threatened the business.
As COO: Ran operations, made systems work in production, managed teams through change, and lived with the consequences of strategic decisions, including my own. Dealt with the reality that operational constraints don't care about strategic vision. Made quarterly numbers while implementing long-term change.
As System Designer: Built the technology, designed the integration architecture, solved problems that "couldn't be done," and made disparate systems work together. Understood what's technically possible versus what's operationally viable.
All at once. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
That's why my coaching is different. I'm not teaching theory about leadership. I'm sharing what actually works when you're the one making the call.
When you tell me about a decision you're facing, I've probably faced something similar as the CEO making the strategic bet, the COO executing it, and the designer building it. Sometimes in the same week. Often on the same day.
THE NLP-BASED APPROACH
I use Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) as the foundation of my coaching because it focuses on how successful people actually think, communicate, and make decisions, not just what they should do in theory.
NLP isn't about positive thinking or motivation. It's about understanding the structure of human experience and behavior.
What NLP brings to leadership development:
Understanding your decision-making patterns
You have patterns in how you process information and make decisions. Some serve you well. Some limit you. NLP helps identify both and shift the limiting ones.
Example: A leader might consistently avoid difficult conversations until they become crises. NLP helps uncover why (the internal process driving the avoidance) and install new patterns that enable earlier, more effective intervention.
Communication across different thinking styles
Your technical team thinks differently than your operations team, and they think differently than your board. NLP provides frameworks for understanding and bridging these different ways of processing information.
Example: Your CTO says "this can't be done" but your COO says "we need it done." NLP helps you understand what each really means and facilitate communication that leads to workable solutions.
Building mental frameworks for complexity
Leadership in technology integration, organizational change, or paradigm shifts requires holding multiple perspectives simultaneously. NLP provides tools for developing this capacity.
Example: You need to evaluate an AI investment from technical, operational, strategic, and financial perspectives all at once. NLP helps build the mental frameworks for integrating these different viewpoints without getting overwhelmed or paralyzed.
Developing genuine resilience
Not "positive thinking" in the face of challenges, but genuine psychological resilience built on understanding how you respond to setbacks and building more effective patterns.
Example: When a major initiative fails, some leaders spiral into self-blame or defensive blame-shifting. NLP helps install patterns that extract learning, maintain perspective, and move forward effectively.
Identifying and shifting limiting beliefs
The beliefs you hold about yourself, your team, your market, and what's possible shape every decision you make. NLP helps surface limiting beliefs and replace them with more useful ones.
Example: A leader believes "my technical team will resist any operational changes." This belief creates behavior that fulfills the prophecy. NLP helps identify and test such beliefs, often revealing they're outdated or inaccurate.
Why NLP + Experience = Powerful Coaching
NLP without real-world leadership experience is psychology without context.
Experience without psychological understanding is advice without transformation.
I combine both: → NLP provides the tools for understanding and changing patterns → 30+ years of leadership provides the context of what actually matters → Together, they create coaching that's both psychologically grounded and operationally practical
WHO THIS IS FOR
You're a good fit if:
✓ You're leading through significant technology or organizational change. You're not just managing steady state; you're navigating transformation where the path isn't clear and the playbook doesn't exist yet.
✓ You need to integrate multiple perspectives (technical, operational, strategic). You're the person who has to make sense of conflicting input from different parts of the organization and synthesize it into coherent action.
✓ You're making decisions where there's no clear "right answer." The experts disagree. The data is incomplete. The stakes are high. And you're the one who has to decide anyway.
✓ You're building leadership capacity for complexity, not just managing tasks. You're not looking for time management tips or delegation frameworks. You're developing the capacity to lead through genuine complexity.
✓ You want coaching from someone who's actually been in the CEO/COO/Designer chairs. You want someone who's made the calls you're facing, not someone who studied them in business school.
✓ You're ready to examine your patterns, not just get advice. You understand that sustainable change comes from understanding and shifting your own patterns, not just getting better advice.
✓ You value directness over diplomatic deflection. You want someone who'll tell you the truth, even when it's uncomfortable, rather than someone who makes you feel good about suboptimal decisions.
You're not a good fit if:
✗ You want a cheerleader who tells you what you want to hear. If you need someone to validate your existing approach rather than challenge it, I'm not your coach.
✗ You're looking for quick fixes or simple frameworks. Leadership development is a sustained engagement. If you want a three-step formula, there are plenty of options. This isn't one of them.
✗ You're not willing to examine your own patterns and assumptions. The most powerful coaching work happens when leaders are willing to look at their own patterns. If you're only interested in fixing "them" (your team, your board, your market), coaching won't help.
✗ You want someone to give you "the answer" rather than help you develop your thinking. I'll share my perspective based on experience, but I won't make your decisions for you. Coaching develops your capacity to decide, not my capacity to tell you what to do.
✗ You're satisfied with theory that hasn't been tested in operational reality. If academic frameworks and leadership books are working for you, keep using them. My approach is for leaders who need something more grounded in actual operational experience.
✗ You're not willing to invest 6-12 months in development. Leadership development isn't a quick fix. If you need immediate crisis intervention or short-term tactical advice, that's consulting, not coaching.
WHAT WE WORK ON
Integration Leadership
Leading when you need to bridge different worlds: technology and operations, innovation and stability, vision and execution.
Most leaders have one primary orientation: technical, operational, or strategic. But leading technology integration requires holding all three perspectives simultaneously.
What we work on: → Understanding how to translate between technical, operational, and strategic languages → Making decisions that serve all three domains, not just your natural preference → Building credibility across different types of expertise → Recognizing when technical feasibility, operational viability, and strategic value are misaligned and what to do about it
Example work: Your CTO says the AI integration is "technically straightforward." Your COO says operations isn't ready. Your CFO wants to know when you'll see ROI. You need to integrate these perspectives into one coherent plan.
We work on: How do you hold all three perspectives? What questions reveal the real issues? How do you communicate decisions that balance competing concerns? How do you avoid the trap of just favoring your natural orientation?
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
Making strategic calls when you don't have complete information, when experts disagree, and when the stakes are high.
The hardest leadership decisions aren't choosing between good and bad, they're choosing between two imperfect options when you can't know the outcome in advance.
What we work on: → Understanding your decision-making patterns (what you overweight, what you ignore, when you delay) → Building frameworks for decisive action without reckless certainty → Knowing when to decide with incomplete information versus when to wait for more data → Managing your own anxiety about high-stakes decisions so it informs but doesn't paralyze → Learning from decisions that didn't work out without spiraling into self-doubt
Example work: You're deciding whether to commit $5M to an AI integration. The vendor demo was impressive. Your technical team is skeptical. Your board is pushing for "transformation." You have 30 days to decide.
We work on: What's driving your hesitation, missing information or fear of being wrong? What information would actually change your decision versus what's procrastination? How do you weigh competing input from technical team versus board pressure? What's your pattern in similar past decisions?
Organizational Change & Resistance
Leading teams through change when they don't understand the technology, don't trust the process, or actively resist.
Change management theory says "communicate the why" and "build buy-in." Real change is messier. People resist for reasons they don't articulate or even understand. Technical teams dig in their heels. Operations sees every change as a threat to stability. Key people quit at critical moments.
What we work on: → Understanding the real sources of resistance (usually not what people say) → Building adoption through design, not just communication → Knowing when to push through resistance versus when to pause and address underlying issues → Managing your own frustration with resistance so it doesn't undermine your effectiveness → Creating the conditions where change becomes the path of least resistance, not most
Example work: You're rolling out new systems. Training is complete. SOPs are documented. But six months in, people are still using workarounds and complaining. Adoption is 40%.
We work on: Why are people resisting, is it the system, the change process, or something deeper? What would make adoption easier than resistance? How are you contributing to the resistance through your own behavior? What needs to change about the approach, not just the communication?
Building Resilient Leadership
Developing the capacity to sustain leadership through extended challenges, setbacks, and uncertainty.
Leadership through technology integration, organizational change, or market shifts isn't a sprint. It's a marathon with no clear finish line. Resilience isn't about "staying positive." It's about maintaining effectiveness through sustained difficulty.
What we work on: → Understanding how you respond to setbacks (the patterns that help and the ones that don't) → Building genuine resilience based on psychological understanding, not just willpower → Managing the tension between maintaining confidence externally while processing doubt internally → Recovering from failures without losing credibility or confidence → Sustaining energy and focus through change initiatives that take years, not months
Example work: A major initiative you championed failed publicly. Your board is questioning your judgment. Your team is demoralized. You're questioning yourself.
We work on: What story are you telling yourself about the failure? How does that story affect your next decisions? How do you rebuild confidence (yours and others') without denying the failure? What patterns led to the failure, and what needs to shift? How do you lead through this without pretending everything is fine?
Systems Thinking in Leadership
Understanding how organizations actually work, not the org chart, but the real systems of communication, decision-making, and execution.
Organizations are systems. When you pull one lever, three other things move in ways you didn't anticipate. Most leaders try to fix problems directly. Systems-thinking leaders understand that direct intervention often makes things worse.
What we work on: → Seeing your organization as an integrated system, not a collection of separate functions → Understanding feedback loops, delays, and unintended consequences → Knowing where to intervene for maximum leverage (usually not where the problem appears) → Recognizing when you're treating symptoms versus addressing root causes → Leading the system, not just the people
Example work: Your quality problems seem to be in manufacturing. You've replaced the manufacturing manager twice. The problems persist. What's actually going on?
We work on: What's the system that's producing quality problems? What's the relationship between sales commitments, production scheduling, quality control, and management pressure? Where's the real leverage point? How are your own interventions (replacing managers) part of the problem?
Executive Presence & Communication
Communicating effectively across different audiences: technical teams, boards, operations, customers.
You need to speak different languages to different audiences without losing your authentic voice. Technical teams want specifics. Boards want strategic implications. Operations wants to know what changes. Customers want to know what it means for them.
What we work on: → Understanding how different audiences process information (and adapting without pandering) → Translating complexity into clarity without oversimplifying → Building credibility across technical, operational, and strategic domains → Maintaining an authentic voice while adapting message to audience → Knowing when to be direct versus when to be diplomatic (and the difference between diplomacy and deception)
Example work: You need to present the same technology initiative to your technical team (who thinks it's too risky), your board (who wants aggressive timelines), and your operations team (who's worried about disruption).
We work on: What does each audience actually need to understand? How do you communicate the same reality in ways each audience can process? How do you maintain consistency while adapting language? Where are you being unclear because you're unclear, versus where you're being diplomatic?
Leading Through Paradigm Shifts
Navigating transitions where the rules are changing and past experience is less reliable.
ERP integration in the 1990s. AI deployment in the 2020s. Cloud migration. Digital transformation. These aren't just "change", they're paradigm shifts where the fundamental assumptions shift.
What we work on: → Recognizing when you're in a paradigm shift (not just normal change) → Understanding what knowledge transfers from past experience and what doesn't → Leading when you don't have all the answers (because nobody does yet) → Building organizational capacity for learning, not just executing → Managing your own uncertainty without pretending you have more clarity than you do
Example work: You're leading AI integration. Your past success was built on understanding every detail. With AI, you can't understand every detail, it's too complex, too fast-moving. How do you lead?
We work on: What leadership approach worked in stable environments, but doesn't work in paradigm shifts? How do you build judgment about AI without becoming an AI expert? How do you make decisions with partial understanding? How do you lead through uncertainty without undermining confidence?
HOW IT WORKS
Initial Assessment (Session 1 - 90 minutes)
The Starting Point for Real Transformation
Before real growth can begin, we first need clarity about who you are as a leader, how you make decisions, and what unconscious patterns drive your results.
That’s what the Leadership & NLP Assessment delivers: a deep, structured diagnostic that goes beyond surface behavior to reveal the root causes of performance gaps, stress patterns, and untapped potential.
Deep dive into your current leadership challenges
We don't start with generic assessment tools. We start with the actual challenges you're facing right now.
→ What decisions are you facing? → What's keeping you up at night? → Where do you feel stuck? → What patterns do you notice in your leadership? → What's working well that you want to build on?
Assessment of your decision-making patterns and leadership approach
Through structured conversation and NLP-based assessment, we identify: → How you process information and make decisions → Your natural strengths and where you're most effective → Patterns that limit your effectiveness → Communication styles and how different audiences experience you → Resilience patterns and how you respond to setbacks
Design of a coaching plan tailored to your specific situation
Based on what we discover, we design a coaching plan that addresses: → Your highest-priority development areas → The real challenges you're facing (not generic leadership development) → Your learning style and what approaches will work for you → Timeline and session structure → How we'll measure progress
Clear decision point: Should we work together?
After the initial session, we both decide if this makes sense. Not every leader is a good fit for my approach. Not every situation requires coaching. We'll be direct about whether this is the right investment for you right now.
Ongoing Coaching (Typically 6-12 months)
Two 60-90-minute monthly sessions (virtual)
We meet every two weeks for 90-minute sessions. Why 90 minutes? Because real coaching work takes time. 60 minutes is barely enough to get into meaningful work. 90 minutes allows space for depth.
Sessions are typically virtual (Zoom/similar) unless in-person makes sense based on location and circumstances.
Real-time work on actual decisions and challenges you're facing
We don't work on hypothetical leadership scenarios. We work on the actual decisions you're facing:
→ The technology investment you're evaluating → The organizational change you're implementing → The difficult conversation you're avoiding → The decision that's keeping you stuck → The pattern that's limiting your effectiveness
This isn't "coaching" in the abstract. It's applied leadership development on your real challenges.
NLP-based interventions to shift limiting patterns
When we identify limiting patterns, we don't just talk about them. We work to shift them using NLP-based interventions:
→ Reframing limiting beliefs → Installing new decision-making patterns → Building new communication approaches → Developing resilience patterns → Creating new ways of processing information
This is active work, not just reflection.
Between-session support for critical decisions or challenges
Leadership challenges don't wait for scheduled sessions. Between sessions, you have access to:
→ Email/text for critical decisions that can't wait two weeks → Brief check-ins when you're facing urgent challenges → Resources and frameworks relevant to what we're working on
This isn't unlimited access, but it's meaningful support when you need it.
Periodic assessments of progress and plan adjustment
Every 8-12 weeks, we assess: → What's shifting? What's not? → Are we working on the right things? → What needs to change about our approach? → What's your experience of the coaching? → Should we continue, adjust, or conclude?
Coaching is a partnership. We adjust based on what's working.
What Makes This Different
We work on real problems, not hypothetical scenarios
Every session is grounded in actual decisions you're facing, real challenges in your organization, and specific patterns you're noticing in your leadership.
I can read technical documentation and understand operational constraints
When you're talking about technology decisions or operational challenges, I understand both the technical reality and the operational implications. Most leadership coaches understand neither.
I've made the decisions you're facing, from every perspective
When you describe a challenge, I've probably faced something similar as the CEO making the call, the COO executing it, and the designer building it. Sometimes in the same week.
NLP provides tools for actual change, not just insight
Insight alone doesn't change behavior. NLP provides structured approaches for shifting the patterns that limit your effectiveness.
Accountability from someone who knows what works in production
I hold you accountable not to theoretical standards, but to what actually works in operational reality. The difference matters.
Direct feedback without diplomatic deflection
I'll tell you the truth, even when it's uncomfortable. If your approach isn't working, you'll hear it directly. If you're avoiding something, I'll name it. If your pattern is limiting you, we'll address it.
This isn't about being harsh. It's about being useful.
INVESTMENT
Leadership coaching is an investment in your capacity to lead through complexity.
This isn't an expense. It's development of your most important capability: leadership effectiveness.
Engagement Structure:
Initial Assessment and Program Design.
Ongoing Coaching (You should be willing to make a 6-month minimum commitment):
Includes: → Two 60-90-minute sessions per month → Between-session support for critical decisions → Resources and frameworks relevant to your development → Periodic progress assessments and plan adjustments
Why 6-month minimum?
Genuine leadership development takes time. You can gain insights in a single session. You can shift specific patterns in a few sessions. But building sustainable new capabilities requires sustained engagement.
Most clients work together for 9-12 months. Some continue longer. A few conclude after 6 months. But meaningful development requires at least 6 months of consistent work.
Payment structure:
Monthly retainer, billed at the beginning of each month.
Cancellation policy:
Cancel any time. If the coaching isn't working for you, we should stop. If I don't believe I'm adding value, I'll say so.
Is this the right investment for you?
Consider the cost of not developing:
→ What's the cost of repeatedly making the same leadership mistakes? → What's the value of cutting your learning curve by years? → What's worth paying to avoid a multi-million dollar strategic error? → How much is it worth to lead through complexity more effectively?
Compare to alternatives:
→ Executive MBA programs: $100K-200K+ and 2 years → Mediocre leadership coaching: $500-1,500/session with no operational experience → Learning through expensive mistakes: Millions and years of setbacks → Figuring it out yourself: Possible, but slow and costly
The real question:
Is developing your leadership capability through sustained, high-quality coaching worth the investment?
If yes, let's talk. If no, that's fine, this may not be the right timing or the right fit.
READY TO START?
Schedule a 20-30-minute initial call to see if Coaching is a fit.
No pressure. No sales pitch.
Just an honest conversation about whether coaching makes sense for where you are right now.
Some leaders need coaching. Some need consulting. Some need both. Some need neither. We'll figure out what makes sense for you.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What's the difference between coaching and consulting?
Consulting: I analyze your situation and give you recommendations. I bring expertise and solve problems.
Coaching: I help you develop your capacity to analyze situations and make decisions. I bring questions and frameworks that build your capability.
Sometimes you need consulting (expert recommendations). Sometimes you need coaching (capability development). Often you need both. We'll be clear about which makes sense when.
Can you do both coaching and consulting for the same client?
Yes, and I often do.
Example: You're evaluating an AI integration (consulting). That evaluation reveals limiting patterns in how you make technology decisions (coaching). We work on both.
The key is being clear about which mode we're in and why.
What if I've never experienced NLP-based coaching?
Most people haven't. That's fine.
In the initial consultation, I'll give you a taste of what NLP-based work feels like. It's different from traditional coaching, more structured, more active, more focused on shifting patterns than just discussing them.
Some people love it immediately. Some are skeptical until they experience results. A few prefer traditional coaching approaches (and I'm not the right coach for them).
You'll know quickly whether the approach works for you.
How do I know if I need coaching versus therapy?
Coaching is for leaders who are fundamentally healthy but want to develop greater capacity, shift limiting patterns, and lead more effectively.
Therapy is for addressing psychological issues that interfere with functioning: trauma, anxiety disorders, depression, relationship dysfunction, etc.
If you're struggling with mental health issues, therapy is the right investment. If you're functioning well but want to lead more effectively, coaching is appropriate.
Sometimes both are valuable at different times or for different issues.
Can coaching really make a difference in 6-12 months?
Yes, if you're willing to do the work.
Coaching isn't magic. It's structured development. The leaders who get the most value: → Are honest about their challenges → Are willing to examine their patterns → Actually implement what we work on between sessions → Give feedback about what's working and what's not
If you show up, do the work, and engage honestly, 6-12 months is enough time for meaningful development.
If you want coaching to be something that happens to you without your active engagement, it won't work.
What if I'm too busy for bi-weekly sessions?
If you're too busy for 60-90 minutes every one or two weeks to develop your leadership capacity, you're too busy.
That's not judgment, it's reality.
Leadership development requires time and focus. If you can't create that space, coaching won't help. You need to address the "too busy" problem first (which might be part of what we work on in coaching).
Do you work with first-time leaders or only experienced executives?
I work primarily with experienced leaders, people who've been in leadership roles for at least several years and are facing complex challenges.
First-time leaders often need mentorship and foundational leadership development. That's valuable but it's not my focus.
My work is most valuable for leaders who: → Have leadership experience but are facing new types of challenges → Are navigating complexity that requires integrating multiple perspectives → Are leading through technology integration or organizational transformation → Have outgrown their current leadership approach and need to develop new capacities
CLOSING
Leadership isn't theory. It's making the call when experts disagree, when the data is incomplete, and when you're the one responsible for the consequences.
It's holding multiple perspectives simultaneously - technical, operational, strategic - when they conflict.
It's making technology decisions that have to work in production, not just sound good in presentations.
It's building organizational capacity for change when people resist what they don't understand.
It's sustaining effectiveness through extended challenges when there's no clear endpoint.
Coaching from someone who's made those calls as CEO, COO, and system designer, simultaneously.
Someone who knows that leadership development isn't about frameworks. It's about building the capacity to navigate complexity, integrate perspectives, make decisions under uncertainty, and lead through challenges that don't have clear answers.
If you're ready to develop that capacity, let's talk.
Is Coaching Right for You? Take a quick Assessment